Saturday, August 1, 2026

The Film Fan (Empty Promises)

Director(s): Bob Clampett (credited as “Robert Clampett”)

Summary: This is basically Friz Freleng’s “She Was an Acrobat’s Daughter” filtered through one of Clampett’s Porky Pig cartoons where Clampett can’t be arsed to put Porky in an interesting situation, but the cartoon itself is an interesting time capsule about what it was like to go to the movies in the 1930s (similar to “Bosko’s Picture Show” and “She Was an Acrobat’s Daughter”). In this one, Porky (who is supposed to be a kid character, but is shown as an adult) is out on a grocery run, but sees a “Kids Admitted Free Day” poster at the local movie theater and decides to partake. The rest of the cartoon is a string of gags involving movie trailers and situations associated with 1930s movie-going (my favorite is the one where a snooty society lady tells the audience that she and her dog don’t go to the movies [there were people like that back then, who thought the movies were low-class. These days, it’s only the half-truth, though the magic is fading as new technology, fatigue for the old, and audiences wanting higher quality continues to grow. I believe things will sort itself out, since there are people out there trying to change the movie-going experience], but the dog obviously makes an exception when he sees a poster for a movie about trees).

Fun Facts

  • Porky’s coin-flipping walk cycle was recycled from “The Daffy Doc.” A bit obvious to be a fun fact, but it is amusing to point out, and it helps you see it for yourself to make sure I’m not just pulling facts out of my butt.
  • The ticket taker is reading John Steinbeck’s The Grapes of Wrath during the scene of Porky finding out about the “Kids Admitted Free” day and running inside. There wouldn’t be a film adaptation of The Grapes of Wrath until 1940 (with John Ford as director).
  • Some movie references for those who think the Golden Age of Hollywood started in the 1980s and 1990s (it didn’t, godddamn it!):

Ahs of a Wizard: The Wizard of Oz, obviously. The Oz books (by Frank L. Baum until his death in 1919, yet continued under different authors until 1963, known as “The Famous Forty,” and considered canon to the series) started in 1900 (that’s 126 years ago, for those keeping score at home) were 39 years old at the time of this short, but the movie that everyone knows (the one MGM produced that had Judy Garland as Dorothy) was released in August of 1939 (so, four months before this short).

Gone With the Breeze: Gone With the Wind (adapted from Margaret Mitchell’s 1936 novel), which was produced by...(gasp): Warner Bros. Studios, same place that also did the Looney Tunes! What’s more, this cartoon came out the day after Gone With the Wind premiered in theaters.

The Masked Marvel and Sterling: Sounds like a rejected Marvel movie, but it isn’t. It’s a reference to the Western serial, The Lone Ranger, with Sterling as a stand-in for the titular hero’s horse, Silver. If the footage from the trailer looks familiar, that’s because it’s recycled from The Lone Stranger and Porky,” which, if you’ve been paying attention, was the first WB cartoon of 1939 and starred Porky Pig in it (even though the role was almost as small as the one here). We’ve come full-circle here, people, because this is the last Bob Clampett-directed Porky cartoon of 1939 (and, by proxy, the 1930s). “The Curious Puppy” from Chuck Jones is the last cartoon of the year and decade.

Letterboxd Says The Darndest Things: I know. I said I wouldn’t bring this back (at least, not as frequently), but this particular review from Brandon Reese (not Tim Brayton, surprisingly) has got me scratching my head on whether he likes it or not, considering he’s pointing out everything that’s wrong with it. Is this that “liking things ironically” trend I kept hearing about from 2010 to 2015?:

I like Clampett the satirist because he barely rises to the level of satire. The target of the gag where a bus pulls up and unrolls like a sardine tin to let dozens of people off is buses, if there even is one. It's less specific targets and way more just a vibe. He can't think of a specific example per se but you know what he's talking about when he says everything is sort of shitty and everybody's an idiot, right? That's the advantage guys in the 30s had from not growing up in a landscape polluted by Bill Hicks.

It's never a good sign when Porky is a child. Porky is a middle aged man somehow simultaneously henpecked and divorced. He carries that with him even in childhood and even though he looks more like a human baby than a pig. And yet this short persists. Porky is merely a framing device, here. Make him a teenager. Who gives a shit? The gags are good, which makes sense because this premise (Porky goes to the movies) is actually a flimsy excuse to invent Robot Chicken.

This short ends on an unbelievably weak note but I don't care because I had already decided I liked it at that point.

About the only thing I agree with him about is the fact that Porky looks like an adult here, but takes advantage of a “Kids Admitted Free” day at the movie theater. Either that’s a continuity error in a series that normally doesn’t have fans who care about them or Porky is taking advantage of “Kids Admitted Free” day because he’s young enough to lie about his age and the movie ticket takers don’t care (though they do care enough to send the manager to announce that Porky’s mom — and everyone else’s — notified the audience about a child who would rather take in a show than go out grocery shopping for the family).

In contrast to that, I found this review of the cartoon from “Eliza’s Review Blog” (which I used before as research on “The Daffy Doc”), whose writer does paint it as better than it is, despite being a thin attempt at recreating “She Was an Acrobat’s Daughter.”

The Channel(s): Nickelodeon (Looney Tunes on Nickelodeon, colorized redrawn version)

Part(s) Edited: A rather innocuous edit this go-around. The redrawn colorized version cut a brief scene introducing the Looney Tone (not “Tune”) News by Warmer Bros. (“The Newsreel With ‘Oomph’”), featuring newsreel anchor Dole Promise (reference to Lowell Thomas, who actually was a newsreel anchor, as well as a TV and radio broadcaster, a non-fiction writer focusing on biography and travel narratives; and a documentarian whose works turned T.E. Lawrence [a.k.a “Lawrence of Arabia”] into an international celebrity).

What Grinds My Gears About the Edit(s): Yeah, this is one of those edits that doesn’t do anything to ruin the cartoon, but it does aggravate me when stuff like this gets cut for little to no reason. Since this edit happened in the redrawn colorized version, I’m going to assume the cut was done for the usual reason: because the redrawn-colorized versions of black and white shorts had the worst art and animation, and there were times where footage would be so unusable that it had to be scrapped.

There was also word on the old Censored Cartoons Page back in the late 1990s into the early 2000s that there may have been other cuts to this, like how there may have been a scene featuring the trailer for the double feature Honeymoon in Bali with The Old Maid that was allegedly replaced with a shot of Porky and two ducks watching the screen. That claim has since been debunked when the Censored Cartoons Page was revamped. I can see why people would want to believe parts were cut: because of either a tight budget or the Hays Office telling Bob Clampett they had issues with the joke, the actual scene showing that trailer either had to be cut or was only written or pitched as an idea, but never made. The cartoon does feel like it’s been stitched together (as I mentioned before: most of it is recycled from “She Was an Acrobat’s Daughter,” while Porky’s walk cycle from “The Daffy Doc” was reused) with random gags holding it together.

Video Comparison

Availability Uncut: Today, I’d like to release a new format that I hope to keep for later posts. It’s a timeline showing the release years of a short, followed by any interesting notes. I’m doing one for the physical media releases and one for streaming and digital download.

“The Film Fan” Physical Media Release Timeline








Is/Was It on Streaming or Digital Download: It was/is on streaming, but not digital download.

“The Film Fan” Streaming Media Release Timeline




‘Til next time: Stay Looney and Be Merrie!

Thursday, July 23, 2026

Drawn and Quartered -- The Lost Episodes -- Hare-Um Scare-Um (I Once Was Lost...)

Welcome to another installment of Drawn and Quartered: The Lost Episodes. Originally, I was saving this for a post about cartoons whose lost and edited scenes were done before theatrical release and said scenes are either lost to time or have been rediscovered decades later. I figured, since the previous cartoon I covered and the next one I will cover are rather dull, I thought I’d give my readers something interesting, like a color cartoon that’s basically a rough draft version of what the Bugs Bunny vs. Elmer Fudd cartoons would be like:

Director(s): Ben Hardaway and Cal Dalton

Summary: Upset over the soaring price of meat (aren’t we all...though this was made back in the late 1930s, not the mid-to-late 2020s. Anyone who thinks the past is better than the present can bend over and stuff a fat one up their [...sorry, manners]), an angry-looking Egghead clone (named John Sourpuss, according to the script, the model sheets, and other behind-the-scenes documents used in planning and outlining the cartoon) takes his dog with him to go hunting...and encounter a crazy rabbit that charitably can be considered a protoype version of Bugs Bunny (and is, according to animation historians, professional and amateur).

Fun Facts: 

  • As you can tell from the summary, this is an early version of a Bugs vs. Elmer Fudd cartoon, specifically 1940’s “A Wild Hare” (directed by Tex Avery) and any cartoon where it’s Bugs vs. a human antagonist (and some anthropomorphic animals, like the hillbilly vultures, Pappy and Elvis, from “Backwoods Bunny” [though I think their best work was on the 1960 Foghorn Leghorn cartoon “The Dixie Fryer”]). It has most of the hallmarks: Bugs dressing in drag to seduce his antagonist, the antagonist going nuts after repeatedly being defeated, and Bugs tricking humans and animals alike. The “singing about how crazy he is” is more of a hallmark associated with Daffy Duck back when he actually lived up to his name and wasn’t a greedy, egotistical jerk or a comic loser. The early Bugs Bunny was basically described as “Daffy Duck in a rabbit suit,” but I’d also like to add that early Bugs Bunny (at least the Hardaway and Dalton version) had a laugh that sounded like Woody Woodpecker.
  • Porky Pig makes an appearance in this short...as part of a banner that advertises a theatrical showing of a Looney Tune cartoon. The WB cartoons did meta humor before it was everywhere, and yet, it’s funnier than most modern examples. Wonder why? (she asked as if she didn’t know).
  • Sorry, no inflation calculator today, as there are no actual numbers on how much meat cost back in 1939 for me to compare it to 2026. That definitely would have been helpful. You can look up the information yourself if you’re that curious.

The Channel(s): Theatrical version that made its rounds on television and home media until just recently, though some places do air the edited version (more on that in the next segment)

Part(s) Edited: Prior to 2011, there was speculation online (and possibly offline, but mostly online) about a possible lost ending after the part where John Sourpuss foolishly challenges proto-Bugs Bunny to and his family to fight him, followed by a music sting, a fade to black, and the "That's All, Folks!" ending card. Seems like a Bolivian Army ending (as it’s described on TV Tropes) would have been a good way to go out, but no, apparently there was more to it. The old Censored Cartoons Page (and a lot of classic cartoon forums) had two suppositions on what could have been cut:

Supposition #1: The warren of proto-Bugs Bunnies leap on John Sourpuss and whale on him just as the cartoon closes out. Very common to think that that would be the end.

Supposition #2: Same as above, only with a rather hilariously morbid scene of the big cartoon cloud of violence clearing and John and his dog being reduced to heads and rolling off into the sunset as the short closes out. Yeah, the Looney Tunes cartoons weren’t at that level of twisted comedy just yet (and, even if they were, the Hays Office probably would have intervened — especially if Bob Clampett were involved). This is a Hardaway and Dalton cartoon. Their shorts weren’t anything to write on this blog about (I’m so sure this is the only short that actually has had censorship done to it), though I do like “Bars and Stripes Forever” and “Hobo Gadget Band” for childhood nostalgia reasons, thanks to TBS and TNT being the closest thing my family had to Cartoon Network before Comcast turned it into a basic cable channel in 1999. I know the Mandela effect and misremembering events from childhood can be a helluva drug, but who thought that could have been a believable ending to this? I’ll tell you who: the people who discussed the lost ending on this late 1990s/early 2000s edit of the old Censored Cartoons Page.

So, which ending is the true ending that was found in 2011?

Neither.

“Wait, are you saying the abrupt ending is how it’s always been?”

No, I’m saying there was a third option that, to me, seems weaksauce compared to the two endings that could have been. The actual ending of “Hare-um Scare-um” goes like this:

According to David Gerstein's blog, the actual ending shows John Sourpuss disheveled (but not decapitated) after being beaten by the proto-Bugs clan. Proto-Bugs returns to give John his busted rifle, commenting that he should get it fixed, lest someone get hurt, then returns to his loony self by bouncing on his head like a pogo stick down the road. John then snaps in frustration and does the same thing.

If the ending sounds familiar, it’s because it’s almost the same ending as the one for “Daffy Duck and Egghead” and Gerstein surmises that the ending was cut before theatrical release for that very reason. No, I don’t know or have a good personal reason why an ending would get the axe before theatrical release or upon being reissued just because it was a clone of a previous ending, especially since “Hare-um Scare-um” as a whole already feels like a cross between a less successful “Daffy Duck and Egghead” and “A Wild Hare” if Tex Avery wasn’t involved.

What Grinds My Gears About the Edit(s): This is one of those cases where the edit doesn’t bother me much (probably because I’m used to seeing it more frequently than the uncut version, even though I have access to both the uncut version and the edited version). What bothers me is the fact that it’s cut for such a mundane reason (though I’ve heard more mundane and inexplicable reasons than this and will continue to hear them for as long as this blog is active). On the bright side, the lost ending is found and has been released, but, as the “Availability Uncut” and “Is/Was It on Streaming or Digital Download” sections will show, the full, uncut version isn’t as widely available as it should be.

Video Comparison


Availability Uncut: As I mentioned before, “Hare-um Scare-um” had both the theatrical release without the lost ending and the original version with the lost ending released, so I’ve called upon my old friend, Phyllis, the Physical Media Release Table to show us what physical media releases had the theatrical version without the lost ending and which had the original cut with the lost ending:

Release Title

Format

Year of Release

Edited Theatrical Version

Uncut, Original Version

Golden Age of Looney Tunes, volume 2, side 2 (“Early Wabbits”)

Laser Disc

1992

Yes

No

Invisible Stripes (bonus feature, 1995 dubbed version)

DVD

2010

Yes

No

Looney Tunes Platinum Collection, volume 2 (disc 2, restored to standard definition)

DVD

2012

No

Yes

Looney Tunes Platinum Collection, volume 2 (disc 2, restored to high definition)

Blu-ray

2012

No

Yes

 

Is/Was It on Streaming or Digital Download: While Phyllis’ table makes it clear there’s a 50/50 split between which releases had the “lost ending” cut and which had the “abrupt ending” cut, Stanley Streamer’s table shows us that the porportions are more 75/25:

Streaming Service

How Long the Short Was on the Service

Edited Theatrical Version

Uncut, Original Version

Boomerang App

2019 to 2024

No

Yes

HBO Max

2020 to 2023

No

Yes

Max

2023 to 2025

No

Yes

Tubi

2025 and ongoing as of this writing

Yes

No

 

‘Til next time: Stay Looney and Be Merrie!

Labels